Eintrag weiter verarbeiten

Mission impossible? UN mediation in Libya, Syria and Yemen

The upheavals in the Arab world since 2011 have led to civil wars in three countries: Libya, Syria and Yemen. In all three cases, the United Nations have tried to mediate agreements between the conflicting parties to bring about peace through power-sharing. In this endeavour, the UN can lean on its broad experience in mediation efforts to end civil wars. In the three conflicts examined here, however, the UN’s attempts at reso­lution through power-sharing have failed. In Yemen and Libya, power-shar­ing agreements have not prevented conflicts from lingering on or violence from breaking out again. In Syria, the UN has not even managed to bring together the Syrian parties in the civil war for direct talks. The altered mili­tary balance of power has rendered the initial goal of a political transition unrealistic. This study answers the following questions: Why are these three conflicts so resistant to resolution efforts? What are the specific aspects of the conflict configurations that impede UN efforts? What factors in the UN approach are obstacles to a successful conclusion? What lessons can be learned for future mediation efforts? And how can Europe contribute to progress in this area?

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Personen und Körperschaften: Asseburg, Muriel (VerfasserIn), Lacher, Wolfram (VerfasserIn), Transfeld, Mareike (VerfasserIn), Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (Herausgebendes Organ)
Titel:Mission impossible?: UN mediation in Libya, Syria and Yemen/ Muriel Asseburg, Wolfram Lacher and Mareike Transfeld ; Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs ; [translation by Tom Genrich]
Zusammenfassung:The upheavals in the Arab world since 2011 have led to civil wars in three countries: Libya, Syria and Yemen. In all three cases, the United Nations have tried to mediate agreements between the conflicting parties to bring about peace through power-sharing. In this endeavour, the UN can lean on its broad experience in mediation efforts to end civil wars. In the three conflicts examined here, however, the UN’s attempts at reso­lution through power-sharing have failed. In Yemen and Libya, power-shar­ing agreements have not prevented conflicts from lingering on or violence from breaking out again. In Syria, the UN has not even managed to bring together the Syrian parties in the civil war for direct talks. The altered mili­tary balance of power has rendered the initial goal of a political transition unrealistic. This study answers the following questions: Why are these three conflicts so resistant to resolution efforts? What are the specific aspects of the conflict configurations that impede UN efforts? What factors in the UN approach are obstacles to a successful conclusion? What lessons can be learned for future mediation efforts? And how can Europe contribute to progress in this area?
veröffentlicht:
Berlin SWP [October 2018]
Schlagwörter:
Beschreibung:"Revised and updated English version of SWP-Studie 12/2018"
Gesamtaufnahme: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik: SWP research paper ; 2018, 8 (October 2018)
Format: E-Book
Sprache: Englisch
Übersetzung von: Asseburg, Muriel, 1968 - , Mission impossible?, Berlin : SWP, 2018, 1 Online-Ressource (65 Seiten)
Ergebnisse weiter eingrenzen
  1. 1
    Verfügbar über Online-Ressource
  2. 2
    Verfügbar über Online-Ressource
  3. 3
    Verfügbar über Online-Ressource